by Karen Faulkner, Worthy News Correspondent
(Worthy News) – Lawmakers in Germany are divided over whether to amend the country’s post-Nazi era 1949 Constitution to specify that members of the LGBTQ community cannot be discriminated against on the grounds of their sexual orientation or identity, DW reports.
Persecuted by Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich National Socialism (Nazi) regime, homosexuals were the only group to then also be deliberately omitted from specific protections in the new post-WW2 Constitution, DW reports. Indeed, section 175 of the German Penal Code which the Nazi regime used to persecute homosexuals was only repealed in 1994.
In 2021, Germany’s governing coalition partners the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), the Greens, and the neoliberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) indicated their interest in amending Article 3 of the German constitution to include LGBTQ persons, DW reports.
Article 3 currently provides: “No person shall be favored or disfavored because of gender, parentage, race, language, homeland and origin, faith or religious or political opinions.” The provision does not specify that no one can be disfavored on the grounds of their sexual identity.
Supporters of an amendment continue to push for change but face an uphill struggle as the constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both the Bundestag, the lower house of parliament, and the Bundesrat, which represents the federal states, DW notes. A constitutional amendment requires the support of the country’s conservative parties (the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union), which in this case are not inclined to give it.
“Changing the list of basic rights, in other words, the heart of our constitution, should only be done for very special reasons,” Thorsten Frei, parliamentary secretary for the CDU/CSU group in the Bundestag, told media outlet Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland. “But I also don’t see any reason to amend the constitution, since protection against discrimination on the basis of gender is already enshrined in article 3.”
Copyright 1999-2025 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
Latest News from Worthy News
A revised draft of a UN Security Council resolution outlining the “Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict” is set to be circulated by the United States for review among Security Council members, according to an exclusive report by The Jerusalem Post.
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has declined to immediately pursue membership in the Abraham Accords, citing Israel’s control of the Golan Heights as a primary obstacle, though he suggested the Trump administration could eventually facilitate such negotiations.
French authorities have opened a formal judicial inquiry after chaos erupted during a concert by the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra in Paris, where protesters lit flares and shouted anti-Israel slogans before being subdued by audience members.
Russia’s Republic of Dagestan has become the focus of an embarrassing aviation scandal after a helicopter carrying senior defense-industry officials broke apart in mid-air and crashed — an event caught on video and widely shared online, prompting authorities to launch a criminal investigation.
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) faced an unprecedented crisis Monday after its director-general and head of news resigned amid accusations of political bias at what was once regarded as the flagship of both Britain and journalism worldwide.
President Donald Trump secured a significant diplomatic breakthrough Monday as Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa signed an agreement bringing Syria into the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, making the war-torn nation the 90th member of the U.S.-led counterterrorism alliance.
In a disappointing setback for religious freedom advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court declined without comment to hear former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis’s appeal, leaving in place a $360,000 judgment against her for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The justices let stand lower court rulings that found she violated couples’ constitutional rights under the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, despite what her legal team characterizes as a conflict with her First Amendment religious liberty rights.