By Stefan J. Bos, Chief International Correspondent Worthy News
VILNIUS/BUDAPEST (Worthy News) – Europe’s leading human rights watchdog says Britain, the European Union, the United States, and others an artificial intelligence (AI) treaty amid concerns the technology threatens fundamental freedoms and human rights.
The Council of Europe called the “Al Convention” the first legally binding agreement on AI, which spread worldwide.
The accord, which has been in the works for years, was adopted in May after discussions between 57 countries.
It addresses the risks Al may pose while promoting responsible innovation. We must ensure that the rise of AI upholds our standards rather than undermining them,” Council of Europe Secretary-General Marija Pejcinovic Buric stressed.
She said that the text was an “open treaty with a potentially global reach” and urged more countries to sign it and for countries that had already done so to ratify it.
The Council explained that the treaty “provides a legal framework covering the entire lifecycle of AI systems.”
“It promotes AI progress and innovation while managing the risks it may pose to human rights, democracy, and the rule of law,” it stressed.
The AI Convention was opened for signature at a conference of Council of Europe justice ministers in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital.
It comes just months after EU ministers gave final approval to the bloc’s own Artificial Intelligence Act, which aims to regulate the use of AI in “high-risk” sectors.
“This Convention is a major step to ensuring that these new technologies can be harnessed without eroding our oldest values, like human rights and the rule of law,” Britain’s justice minister, Shabana Mahmood, said in a statement.
The Al Convention mainly focuses on protecting the human rights of people affected by Al systems.
It is separate from the EU Al Act, which entered into force last month.
Copyright 1999-2025 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
Latest News from Worthy News
A revised draft of a UN Security Council resolution outlining the “Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict” is set to be circulated by the United States for review among Security Council members, according to an exclusive report by The Jerusalem Post.
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has declined to immediately pursue membership in the Abraham Accords, citing Israel’s control of the Golan Heights as a primary obstacle, though he suggested the Trump administration could eventually facilitate such negotiations.
French authorities have opened a formal judicial inquiry after chaos erupted during a concert by the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra in Paris, where protesters lit flares and shouted anti-Israel slogans before being subdued by audience members.
Russia’s Republic of Dagestan has become the focus of an embarrassing aviation scandal after a helicopter carrying senior defense-industry officials broke apart in mid-air and crashed — an event caught on video and widely shared online, prompting authorities to launch a criminal investigation.
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) faced an unprecedented crisis Monday after its director-general and head of news resigned amid accusations of political bias at what was once regarded as the flagship of both Britain and journalism worldwide.
President Donald Trump secured a significant diplomatic breakthrough Monday as Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa signed an agreement bringing Syria into the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, making the war-torn nation the 90th member of the U.S.-led counterterrorism alliance.
In a disappointing setback for religious freedom advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court declined without comment to hear former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis’s appeal, leaving in place a $360,000 judgment against her for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The justices let stand lower court rulings that found she violated couples’ constitutional rights under the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, despite what her legal team characterizes as a conflict with her First Amendment religious liberty rights.